Lagos Former presidential candidate of the Labour Party (LP), Mr. Peter Obi, has strongly criticised the recent demolition of shops at the Aspamda section of the Lagos International Trade Fair Complex, describing the action as disproportionate and economically unjust.
Obi made the remarks during a visit to the site in Ojo, where more than 19 plazas were reportedly demolished on September 25, resulting in the destruction of goods said to be worth billions of naira.
“This demolition is not just about structures; it’s about people’s livelihoods,” Obi stated on his official social media handle. “Governance must balance the law with compassion. A government should not pride itself on being legally correct if, in the process, it becomes morally wrong.”
The Lagos State Government has defended the exercise, stating that the affected structures were illegally constructed and obstructed drainage channels, thereby contributing to recurring flooding in the area. Officials also claimed that appropriate warnings were issued and alternative spaces provided to affected traders.
However, Obi, accompanied by Labour Party chieftains including Senators Enyinnaya Abaribe and Victor Umeh, called for an urgent review of the state’s approach to urban enforcement. He pledged to advocate for a legislative inquiry into the incident.
“To destroy legitimate investments without due process is unjust and destructive,” Obi said, describing the action as an economic blow to already struggling small business owners. “It is a punishment far exceeding any alleged infraction.”
Reacting to Obi’s comments, Lagos State Commissioner for Information, Gbenga Omotoso, accused the former Anambra State governor of politicising the issue and spreading misinformation.
“No government takes pleasure in carrying out demolitions, but the law must be obeyed,” Omotoso said. “The traders were duly notified, and relocation options were made available. The government cannot allow illegal structures that endanger public safety to stand.”
The demolition has sparked widespread public concern and debate, particularly among market stakeholders and civil society groups who argue that many traders were not adequately informed or compensated.
As calls grow for a more humane and consultative approach to enforcement, the controversy is likely to remain a key talking point in the months ahead, particularly in the lead-up to 2027 elections, where economic justice and urban development are expected to feature prominently in national discourse.
Leave a comment