As APC National Chairman, Nentawe Yilwatda declares that consensus candidacy must be a product of voluntary agreement among all aspirants and not an imposed arrangement, the party’s position was made clear, inclusive, consultative, and rooted in democratic harmony. His statement reflects a leadership that understands the delicate balance required to manage ambitions while preserving unity within the party.
However, in what can only be described as a reckless and ill-advised response, Benjamin Kalu fired back with a rigid and dismissive position: “Aspirants are those who have paid for their forms and screened ready for primaries elections, not social media declarations. Make no mistakes, in APC Abia, we will follow democratic process to the latter and in a transparent manner.” This reaction not only contradicts the chairman but exposes a troubling tendency toward political exclusion.
Kalu’s statement is deeply flawed and deserving of outright condemnation. It is laced with arrogance and a false sense of authority that attempts to redraw the boundaries of participation within the party. By narrowing the definition of aspirants, he seeks to sideline legitimate political actors and suppress the broader consultative processes that often precede formal declarations.
Even more disturbing is the tone of finality in his words, as though he alone reserves the right to interpret and enforce democratic processes within the party. This is not just misguided, it is dangerous. Such a posture breeds division, fuels resentment, and erodes trust among stakeholders who expect fairness, openness, and respect for collective decision-making.
In sharp contrast, leaders like Mascot Uzor Kalu, the Abia 2027 Governorship Election Aspirant, have continued to demonstrate a far more refined and inclusive political style, engaging widely and building consensus without hostility. Similarly, Henry Ikoh exemplifies composure and bridge-building, qualities that strengthen party unity rather than weaken it.
Kalu’s outburst is not just a misstep, it is a glaring indictment of his approach to leadership. At a time when the APC must close ranks and present a united front, his comments introduce unnecessary friction and cast doubt on his commitment to true democratic values. Such conduct must be firmly rejected if the party is to maintain credibility and cohesion heading into the 2027 political landscape.
